Although I never read political books written in the decade to which they are reporting (too close to me and not far enough from the events), this one could be tempting (no, I won't be reading it either though).
Even today, the left wing wants to believe Hillary had the election stolen. Americans were stupid or blind. Trump brainwashed them. And on it goes without understanding how the Democratic party is part of the problem and why Trump wasn't the only one winning elections in 2016.
Personally, I believe Hillary could not speak to her real goals out of the belief Americans weren't ready for them. She was likely convinced she was right about what she felt should be done. The thing is-- how many Americans support globalization when it impacts American jobs? Being a nationalist has been turned into being a racist by the left, but truly can you help others when your own life or nation is deteriorating?
Most of those, willing to sacrifice
jobs here, aren't worried about losing theirs. They are rich, on
pensions they feel are safe, or have jobs that are not devalued here by
treaties that favor other nations. They may even benefit from cheaper
labor at the bottom (all the while espousing a $15 minimum wage, which
won't help the bottom when prices rise).
Obama did not run on being a globalist because he knew he'd lose. He though did a lot to put globalism into our laws and even treaties. The first time I heard him talk about it publicly was after the election. I would say what he's done since the election-- going from one island paradise to another-- says a lot about how he sees this country. The friends he's vacationed with tells something more.
I get it how some argue we are all one. The world is one big whole, and we must all care about everyone, our enemies, and especially the poorest of nations.
Anyway the book is about the Clinton campaign and what went wrong. I don't think many who pay attention to politics must read it to know. We were reading about it as it went...
A Rain Trueax blog created as a place to discuss ideas and explore differences. First will be my opinion, when something has tweaked my interest or I've seen an article I want to share. Then will come your opinion if you choose to comment. This gives us a chance to have a dialogue where we sometimes agree to disagree. Such conversations are, in my opinion, always win/wins. (Of course, I'd believe that-- I am a moderate).
In the sidebar are political sites and blogs. I don't have to agree with them. They are not hate spewing (that is a bridge too far) but they are partisan and discussing political issues of the day. BUT, if they consistently only have a partisan agenda-- and they annoy me-- they disappear for a time-- or forever depending on whether they change the 'error' of their ways ;)